<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romanians [heart] bears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/</link>
	<description>A blog by Aaron Logan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/comment-page-1/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>I find this odd to receive a request for stamp art approval too. I today received an email from the stamp artists also. My spectacled bear picture is up for use also. It is the one directly right of the circled one in the graphic above.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1169/1155070047_cd605cd5a9.jpg

I was wondering what other information you found about the authenticity of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this odd to receive a request for stamp art approval too. I today received an email from the stamp artists also. My spectacled bear picture is up for use also. It is the one directly right of the circled one in the graphic above.</p>
<p><a href="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1169/1155070047_cd605cd5a9.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1169/1155070047_cd605cd5a9.jpg</a></p>
<p>I was wondering what other information you found about the authenticity of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain Sweat</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain Sweat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>Nice picture for a stamp.   You may want to consider creating a commentary stamp of your own.  This stamp actually moves, but very few blogs accommodate this feature.   

D.C. Residents Surprised by Larry Craig New Year Stamps

Taking advantage of the recent return of the D.C. postmark, after a six-year hiatus, local area residents are eagerly pairing the non-sanctioned Sen. Larry Craig stamp alongside the USPS required 41-cent stamp.

This ensures that the so-called &quot;D.C. holiday stamp&quot; receives the coveted postmark and the U.S. Postal Service has an officially sanctioned and paid for stamp on the envelope.

D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, who shepherded in the return of the D.C. postmark after a six-year hiatus, is predicted to take full credit for the idea of the Larry Craig holiday stamp, as is her usual practice in such matters. 

I was happily surprised to see my greeting card envelope this season. I preferred it to the card itself.Click below to see stamp:http://www.topix.com/member/profile/jumpstart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice picture for a stamp.   You may want to consider creating a commentary stamp of your own.  This stamp actually moves, but very few blogs accommodate this feature.   </p>
<p>D.C. Residents Surprised by Larry Craig New Year Stamps</p>
<p>Taking advantage of the recent return of the D.C. postmark, after a six-year hiatus, local area residents are eagerly pairing the non-sanctioned Sen. Larry Craig stamp alongside the USPS required 41-cent stamp.</p>
<p>This ensures that the so-called &#8220;D.C. holiday stamp&#8221; receives the coveted postmark and the U.S. Postal Service has an officially sanctioned and paid for stamp on the envelope.</p>
<p>D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, who shepherded in the return of the D.C. postmark after a six-year hiatus, is predicted to take full credit for the idea of the Larry Craig holiday stamp, as is her usual practice in such matters. </p>
<p>I was happily surprised to see my greeting card envelope this season. I preferred it to the card itself.Click below to see stamp:<a href="http://www.topix.com/member/profile/jumpstart" rel="nofollow">http://www.topix.com/member/profile/jumpstart</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarisa</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronlogan.com/blog/archives/2007/12/23/550/#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>What about the first stamp? Do you think it improves the diplomatic relations between România and China? :) It seems to be just a stamp collection with bears all over the world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the first stamp? Do you think it improves the diplomatic relations between România and China? :) It seems to be just a stamp collection with bears all over the world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

